Mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 33:40

אמר רבא

He replied, He is liable for each act,and is derived [from the law of Sabbath] by an a fortiori conclusion: If in the instance of Sabbath, where there is but one prohibition, in that man is cautioned against [profaning] the Sabbath but the Sabbath is not cautioned against him, one is liable for each act, how much more should he be liable for each act in the instance of a menstruant woman, where the prohibition is twofold, in that a man is cautioned against connection with a menstruant woman, and a menstruant woman is cautioned against connection with a man! He [R'Akiba] retorted: No.

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 33:40. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.